Governance & Nonprofit Best Practices

Related Party Transactions: How to Structure Them Properly

Nonprofit Tax Risk & Strategy Series (Part 4)

Transactions involving insiders are a common and often necessary part of operating a nonprofit organization.

However, they are also one of the most closely reviewed areas by the IRS.

These transactions are not prohibited—but they must be properly structured, approved, documented, and disclosed. When they are not, they can raise concerns about private benefit, governance, and overall compliance.

Understanding how to manage these transactions is essential to reducing risk.


What Is a Related Party Transaction?

A related party transaction generally involves an individual or entity that has a close relationship with the organization.

This may include:

  • Officers and directors
  • Key employees
  • Family members of insiders
  • Businesses owned or controlled by insiders

These relationships are disclosed on Form 990, including Schedule L, and may also affect other areas of the return.


Why the IRS Focuses on These Transactions

The IRS reviews related party transactions to ensure that the organization is not providing improper private benefit.

Tax-exempt organizations must operate for the benefit of the public—not for the financial benefit of insiders.

While transactions with related parties may be appropriate, the IRS evaluates whether they:

  • Are conducted at fair market value
  • Serve the organization’s best interest
  • Are approved through an independent process
  • Are fully disclosed on Form 990

In many cases, the issue is not the transaction itself—but the lack of transparency or documentation.


Common Areas of Risk

Business Transactions with Insiders

Payments to businesses owned or controlled by insiders are common—but highly scrutinized.

Examples include:

  • Consulting or advisory services
  • Vendor contracts
  • Professional services

These transactions must be conducted at arm’s length, meaning they reflect terms that would be agreed upon between unrelated parties.


Loans to or from Insiders

Loans involving insiders can raise concerns, particularly if:

  • Terms are not clearly documented
  • Interest rates are below market
  • Repayment terms are unclear

All loan arrangements should be formalized and consistently applied.


Leases and Property Arrangements

Leasing arrangements involving insiders—such as office space or equipment—must reflect fair market value.

Informal or preferential arrangements can create compliance risk.


Transactions Involving Family Members

Transactions involving family members of insiders are also subject to review.

For example:

  • Hiring a relative of a board member
  • Contracting with a family-owned business

These relationships must be identified and evaluated for disclosure purposes.


Incomplete or Missing Disclosures

One of the most common issues is failing to fully disclose related party transactions.

This may include:

  • Omitting transactions from Schedule L
  • Providing incomplete information
  • Inconsistencies across the return

Because Form 990 is a public document, incomplete disclosures can raise questions—even when transactions are appropriate.


The Most Common Issue: Lack of Structure

Many organizations do not have a formal process for identifying and managing related party transactions.

As a result:

  • Transactions may not be identified early
  • Documentation may be incomplete
  • Disclosures may be inconsistent

The issue is often not the transaction itself, but the absence of a clear and consistent process.


How to Structure Related Party Transactions Properly

Organizations can reduce risk by implementing structured procedures:

  • Maintain and update conflict of interest disclosures annually
  • Identify related parties before entering into transactions
  • Evaluate transactions based on fair market value
  • Obtain approval from disinterested board members
  • Document how terms were determined, including comparability data
  • Ensure accurate and complete reporting on Form 990

A proactive approach helps ensure compliance and transparency.


Why This Matters

Related party transactions are visible not only to the IRS, but also to:

  • Donors and grantors
  • Regulators
  • Charity watchdog organizations

Improperly structured or disclosed transactions can lead to:

  • Increased IRS scrutiny
  • Questions about governance practices
  • Potential excise taxes in certain cases
  • Reputational risk

Transparency is critical.


Final Thought

Related party transactions are not inherently problematic—but they are highly visible and closely reviewed.

The key is not to avoid these transactions, but to structure them properly, document them thoroughly, and disclose them transparently.

A well-structured approach helps protect both the organization and its mission.


What’s Next

In Part 5, we will focus on:

Governance and internal controls—and what your Form 990 reveals about your organization.

Dr. Beckham has over 19 years of experience in nonprofit tax consulting. She is passionate about providing clients with valuable insights into how they can stay true to their missions and maintain their tax-exempt status. She focuses on federal and state tax planning and compliance for public charities, private foundations, and other tax-exempt organizations. Dr. Beckham has provided tax consulting and annual compliance services to hundreds of nonprofit organizations. She also performs tax planning, analysis, and research to help clients determine appropriate resolutions to their tax issues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *